# Interested to contribute to langgraph postgre checkpointer for multiple adapter support

**URL:** <https://forum.langchain.com/t/interested-to-contribute-to-langgraph-postgre-checkpointer-for-multiple-adapter-support/3633>\
**Category:** LangGraph\
**Tags:** product-feedback, python-help, feature-request\
**Created:** [May 1, 2026, 12:18pm UTC](https://forum.langchain.com/t/interested-to-contribute-to-langgraph-postgre-checkpointer-for-multiple-adapter-support/3633 "2026-05-01T12:18:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shantam29](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b2d939/32.png) [@shantam29](https://forum.langchain.com/u/shantam29)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2026, 12:18pm UTC](https://forum.langchain.com/t/interested-to-contribute-to-langgraph-postgre-checkpointer-for-multiple-adapter-support/3633/1 "2026-05-01T12:18:13Z")

</div>

Posted this last week

> [@Feature Request: Driver abstraction for checkpoint-postgres: to build support for asyncpg and other adapters .Interested to contribute to langgraph (python)](https://forum.langchain.com/t/feature-request-driver-abstraction-for-checkpoint-postgres-to-build-support-for-asyncpg-and-other-adapters-interested-to-contribute-to-langgraph-python/3592):
>
> Hey all , I’ve been working with langgraph postgres checkpointer on a client project and ran into an issue. Current checkpoint-postgres is tightly coupled to psycopg3, which is actually a great choice , natively asyc , unified sync/async api. However we kind of hit a real world blocker recently. Client’s legal team flagged psycopg3’s LGPL license during procurement review. So we had to shift to asyncpg (Apache 2.0) instead. So I was thinking that it’d be nice to introduce a thin driver adapt…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keenborder786](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/forum.langchain.com/keenborder786/32/1757_2.png) [@keenborder786](https://forum.langchain.com/u/keenborder786)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 3:39am UTC](https://forum.langchain.com/t/interested-to-contribute-to-langgraph-postgre-checkpointer-for-multiple-adapter-support/3633/2 "2026-05-03T03:39:49Z")

</div>

> [@Feature Request: Driver abstraction for checkpoint-postgres: to build support for asyncpg and other adapters .Interested to contribute to langgraph (python)](https://forum.langchain.com/t/feature-request-driver-abstraction-for-checkpoint-postgres-to-build-support-for-asyncpg-and-other-adapters-interested-to-contribute-to-langgraph-python/3592/1):
>
> Hey all , I’ve been working with langgraph postgres checkpointer on a client project and ran into an issue. Current checkpoint-postgres is tightly coupled to psycopg3, which is actually a great choice , natively asyc , unified sync/async api. However we kind of hit a real world blocker recently. Client’s legal team flagged psycopg3’s LGPL license during procurement review. So we had to shift to asyncpg (Apache 2.0) instead. So I was thinking that it’d be nice to introduce a thin driver adapt…

@shantam29 better if you create an issue on [langgraph/libs/checkpoint-postgres at main · langchain-ai/langgraph · GitHub](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/tree/main/libs/checkpoint-postgres) so that maintainers can see about this feature and, if needed, assign it to you.